danalwyn: (Default)
[personal profile] danalwyn
Also possibly better than Schoomaker,

Consider this:

1) Wikipedia claims that a full set of Interceptor Body Armor costs $1,585.
2) Therefore, to equip, say, 150,000 soldiers would take about $237,750,000.
3) The Army Budget for FY 2003 was about $91,000,000,000.
4) The budget for the now-cancelled Comanche helicopter for FY 2003 was listed as $910,200,000 (on top of another $900 million for the Apache Longbow).

So why do we still not have enough body armor to equip our soldiers? I know that there are important purchases to be made, like killer robots and UV helmets and lasers that try and blind people, but shouldn't we at least give the people who do the fighting and the dying a better chance?

Of course, that's just me. It's probably unpatriotic to think this way.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-09-26 03:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] danalwyn.livejournal.com
The overall Comanche program cost the US $8 billion in production and $450-600 million in cancellation fees up to that point according to Wikipedia.

Current top R&D priorities:

Future Combat Systems ($3.4 billion)
Stryker Combat Brigade System ($905 million)
Patriot Upgrade ($872 million)
UH-60 Blackhawk ($691 million)
CH-47 Cargo Modifications ($688.3 million)

Maybe I should explain what all this stuff is used for...

Profile

danalwyn: (Default)
danalwyn

November 2017

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
192021 22232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags