(no subject)

Date: 2009-10-09 11:59 pm (UTC)
It's even weirder than you think. All Nobel nominees have to be... nominated... by February of that year. So someone put Obama's name into the ring when he wasn't even a month into his job. That's... uh... even more premature.

Like you, I don't know many contenders for the Peace Prize this year, but I imagine some of the Iranian opponents to Ahmadinejad (sp?) might be worth a look - did that farce happen early enough? I don't remember. Regardless, I have to say that that Not!Bush (Not!Anyone; you should excel to be awarded something, not merely not fuck things up) is not an acceptable reason to be given the award. I mean, wasn't that part of the reason that Jimmy Carter and Al Gore got theirs? Besides, is that what Peace Prize is for nowadays? Not screwing up?

That's a pretty low bar to hit. I thought the purpose of these things was for outstanding achievements. I mean, in the sciences, you don't even get the award for years/decades after you've made your breakthrough, just so what you've done has time to have a significant impact.

It's great that he's donating the reward money to charity, but still... he hasn't done anything yet. Wait a couple years or five and then we'll see what crops hath grown from these fresh-sown fields.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

danalwyn: (Default)
danalwyn

November 2017

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
192021 22232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags