(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-08 11:32 pm (UTC)
I agree totally.

Normally I can end up with a vague inkling from context and judicious use of google and the dictionary, but even though I love the implications of new research, it's a constant uphill battle to understand wtf they're going on about.

However, in the matter of what is and is not necessary... I tend to err on the side of "ooo, shiny letters from reputable school... yes master, whatever you say master..."

Not sure what that makes me. Our answer to the pious churchman, I guess, science being a new religion and all.

...And somewhere, a million scientists cry out in terror...
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
No Subject Icon Selected
More info about formatting

Profile

danalwyn: (Default)
danalwyn

November 2017

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
192021 22232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags