(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-29 11:22 pm (UTC)
I don't have much of a clue either, which is part of the problem. Of course, I'm male, so I can't really develop a different system on my own. But so far there's been a lot of talk about developing a "female" communication model for the physical sciences, but I haven't seen it yet. This is one of my pet peeves, this seems to be a point reserved just so that it can be brought up in arguments over and over again, and that neither side really wants to see solved.

I need someone who is smarter than I am to comment on how this procedure would be incorporated into a new synthesis.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

danalwyn: (Default)
danalwyn

November 2017

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
192021 22232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags