ext_37872 ([identity profile] lookingforwater.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] danalwyn 2006-06-08 11:32 pm (UTC)

I agree totally.

Normally I can end up with a vague inkling from context and judicious use of google and the dictionary, but even though I love the implications of new research, it's a constant uphill battle to understand wtf they're going on about.

However, in the matter of what is and is not necessary... I tend to err on the side of "ooo, shiny letters from reputable school... yes master, whatever you say master..."

Not sure what that makes me. Our answer to the pious churchman, I guess, science being a new religion and all.

...And somewhere, a million scientists cry out in terror...

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting