ext_37867 ([identity profile] danalwyn.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] danalwyn 2005-10-29 11:22 pm (UTC)

I don't have much of a clue either, which is part of the problem. Of course, I'm male, so I can't really develop a different system on my own. But so far there's been a lot of talk about developing a "female" communication model for the physical sciences, but I haven't seen it yet. This is one of my pet peeves, this seems to be a point reserved just so that it can be brought up in arguments over and over again, and that neither side really wants to see solved.

I need someone who is smarter than I am to comment on how this procedure would be incorporated into a new synthesis.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting